Violence is only legitimate if used in defense of one’s own life or that of another, and only as a last resort, and only if used proportionately.


Depends what the dispute is. If someone's occupying my front porch and won't let me enter my house, I'm going to get violent.


When the other party disagrees with you.


When someone is threatening you with violence and blocking your ability to extract from the situation peacefully. If you can run away, do, but if you can't, hurt them hard and fast so ideally you can escape while they're incapacitated.


Violence is always the answer.


Preemptive strikes are acceptable if you think a dispute may occur.


When someone says that bam margera doesn't look exactly like phil margera


When the hostess says “Sir, this is a Wendy’s”.


Pedophiles, if someone attacks someone who can't defend themselves, oh and also pedophiles.


If the person is truly a massive piece of shit, such as a bully. I remember one time in secondary school some kid relentlessly bullied me. It got to the point where he was kicking my shins (like proper booting) which already hurt from me bumping into everything due to me being a clumsy mf. I just lost my temper and beat him up, to which then he started crying and ran off and I had to explain to a teacher what happened (zero tolerance policy is not a thing here)


It depends


Depends. I don’t condone violence. Typically. But if someone swings at me, better believe I’m going to swing back.


When some wild-eyed, eight-foot-tall maniac grabs your neck, taps the back of your favorite head up against the barroom wall, and he looks you crooked in the eye and he asks you if ya paid your dues, you just stare that big sucker right back in the eye, and you remember what ol' Jack Burton always says at a time like that: "Have ya paid your dues, Jack?" "Yessir, the check is in the mail."